Archive for September, 2009

Am I a Cyberpunk as well as an Immigrant now?

Bell refers to cyberpunk as providing ‘a cognitive map of human-computer interaction’. For me, this reference adds weight to the stereotypical image of digital culture being populated by personalities more confident in cyber society than mainstream f2f interaction: the geeks, teckies, sci-fi buffs, etc. Watching Week 2’s Film Festival took me out my comfort zone. I admire all the special effects and do feel genuinely challenged by the symbolic messages – but I don’t feel any sense of identity and belonging. I’m a social animal who prefers eye contact.

However because of the significance of both the different behaviours and cultural identity, I do respect the value and relevance to including clips like The Matrix. I confess to being enthused and extra motivated to participate in this course – more so than any other course. Thanks to the wonders of the Dongle, I’m typing on the train right now, capturing my immediate thoughts – and posting them.

But am I any different to the real me? Are other passengers looking at me – Twittering, surfing and blogging – as a real computer nerd? I don’t feel different. I know why I’m here. I know what I’m doing.

The key point of this blog is I may not know what territory digital culture is going to take me, what I am going to learn, or exactly how I’m going to behave. But provided I retain site of who I am – ie. an e-learning student and developer – I believe I can apply my cyber interaction to the real world. I am not a cyberpunk – I am a learner.

Tags:

Digital Culture – too immediate

Over the last 24 hours I have tried to find two pieces of data from my learning activities last week. I can call it learning because I can clearly recall the information. They impacted on my thoughts this morning.

The trouble is I can’t find them. This may be due to the huge amount of data I collected over a short space of time. (I haven’t put everything I have found into my Lifestream.) It could also be down to the immediacy data comes to you within digital culture. Recognise it, absorb it – then move on.

From now on, I therefore propose to utilise my Lifestream as a “ball of string”, to retrace my learning steps.

Tags:

Andy’s Week 1 Review

To give relevance to my thoughts at the end of Week 1, I’d like to state my original learning outcome. The reason I am here is this -

to develop a clear understanding of digital culture and the potential opportunities it offers adult education
to widen participation in e-learning
to develop new opportunities for individuals to acquire academic and vocational skills and qualifications, using flexible, blended and e-learning methodologies
to develop my career as an e-learning professional.

My reason for declaring my personal motivations are this. It is these outcomes that bring me to digital culture. It is not my growing awareness of technology and a need to embrace it in order to retain credibility in my profession. It is my desire to harness the potential of Web 2.o technology and create new opportunities. For me, I see the social need before the technological potential.

My personal learning objectives fit neatly with the course outcomes -

have a critical awareness of the key concepts emerging from the study of digital culture

be able to assess the implications of this thought for the history, development and deployment of online education

be able to synthesise these ideas in order to develop criticallyaware, media-specific pedagogies for online learning

have developed practical skills in the use of social media and the presentation of academic discourse online

Week 1 of the course has centred around analysing the pros and cons of digital culture. Issues of power, empowerment, democracy and participation appear at the forefront of discussion. Hand offers a thorough analysis of the pros and cons of digital cultural studies: those relating to the digital as ‘promise’, and those which see it as ‘threat’. As a developer of distance learning, I am naturally enthusiastic about the potential of digital culture to empower individuals to engage and interact with information and communicate more readily. However, my enthusiasm has been challenged by darker impressions -

“The figure of the consumer-citizen takes centre stage where the processes of political management and engagement are inseparable from mass-mediated and customized forms of consumption. Information, instead of being an empowering force for cultural democratization, operates as a substitute for authentic knowledge, particularly where institutional and organizational uses of information centre upon the construction of preference databases.” Hand 2008, p39

I accept to some extent, the darker forces of digital culture. It is true that like satellite TV, there is an overwhelming image that increased choice and availability breeds simply dumming-down and exploitation. But just because huge amounts of the internet has been consumed by pornography and Ebay, does not mean all its users need fall like lemmings into its dark force.

“In essence, where the older communications networks of the nation-state system were vertical, hierarchical and one-directional, the digital information industries made possible by the Net promise horizontal and inter-actional patterns of circulation and flow.” Hands 2008, p24.

The key for me is the true potential of digital culture rests with the user, not the medium itself. I believe much of the negative rhetoric towards the internet is perceptional rather than actual. The technology evolved before society did. Therefore, as consumers, we have often felt as though we are playing catch up. Hence this sense of – machines are using us.

So take my origninal stand point – why am I here. Why are we here? The aim of this course is to broaden our understanding of digital culture. I imagine like most participants, I’ve felt lke a fish out of water this week. I don’t really Facebook or Twitter, so to suddenly be faced with an avalanche of communication from classmates and tutors is daunting. I’m playing catch up – but for a specific reason. So long as I retain focus on my original aim, I believe I can realise the potential for my own learning to be enhanced via the shared contributions of the class.

Of all the Tweets this week, one stands out that adds to my main focus. During an exchange on the aparent freedom and lack of parameters of the course, Jan responded that perhaps we will feel more focussed once we consider the course assessments.

Just like real society, digital culture should retain a sense of purpose. What’s the meaning of life?what’s the meaning of digital life?

Tags: , ,

Dystopia – inclusive or exclusive

A simple, funny clip – but nevertheless, it raises a valid point. In order to embrace the empowerment of digital culture, individuals must have the capacity to actually engage with it.

“What is common to these models is the idea that lack of access to digital resources constitutes and also exemplifies broader social inequalities and divisions.” referring to more than simply having access in a physical sense, this is now taken to mean how specific relations between digital information and persons might themselves
constitute divides – drawn in terms of information skills and use patterns, of senses of competence, and of democratic participation in digital culture (Chadwick 2006;
Norris 2001). Even for those with access to digital media, the future remains insecure in a different way, where such spaces actually reinforce existing social and cultural
divisions and hierarchies, and where the pace of change and the possibilities of ‘keeping up’ with emerging forms of social capital appears frenetic.” Hand, M (2008) p34-35

This raises a fundamental issue for me, and perhaps explains why e-learning has taken so long to take offin society. (I remember all the rhetoric in the 1990s – nobody will be left in the classroom). For me, the problem with digital culture is it often appears to be lead by technology, not society. Therefore, participants feel threatened by exclusion to engage in the digital world. For many, this is as immigrant or alien digital citizens.Digital turnover

Tags:

Hand – response to Jen

This week I have truelly been experimenting with flexible learning. I’ve been snatching moments at work and sitting on the train, dipping in and out of the course website and social networks.

It took two readings of Hand to grasp an understanding of what he was saying. Maybe 7.30am is too early to get your head round what is a fairly comprehensive text on the democratic impact of digital culture.

In contrast, browsing Bing Videos, I came across -Web 2.0 is here. It’s message was immediate. “Data is not controlled by anyone …. but by many…. We are in control.

I now realise – like other classmates – Hand offers a comprehensive analysis of the impact of digital culture. In hindsight, I now find my comparison with the short video a bit naive. But this in itself represents one of the dynamics of social networking – sharing immediate thoughts can linger.

Tags:

Confessions of a Twitter Prof

I like this quote from Terri Main. As an experienced educator in cyberculture, her views link well with my Rogerian, approach to teaching. I always felt I wasn’t the teacher, merely a facilitator of learning.

“The online instructor is not the sage on the stage, but the guide by the side. Online education is primarily student driven instruction. A social network filled with “friends” does have a leveling effect.”

http://www.polivkavox.com/2009/09/confessions-of-twitter-prof.html

Tags:

Blog here?

Taking a wee browse through the pages during coffee break. So is this where my blogging happens? So much digital culture to interact with – so little competence.

Hello world!

Hi to Sian, Jen and my new class mates on E-learning and Digital Cultures.

 Andy from East Lothian, Scotland here. I’ve taken a year’s break from my Masters. Now back to finish it. Look forward to studying with you all.

andyavatar