<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arthur&#039;s E-learning and Digital Cultures Blog &#187; Sibylle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh/tag/sibylle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh</link>
	<description>Part of the MSc in E-learning at the University of Edinburgh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Week Seven Summary (2): Community and our Ethnographies</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh/2009/11/08/week-seven-summary-cont-some-lessons-learned-from-our-ethnographies/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh/2009/11/08/week-seven-summary-cont-some-lessons-learned-from-our-ethnographies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arthurh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Week Seven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ededc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eneas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sibylle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I want to focus on the types of virtual association I have observed with 10 of the 12 mini-ethnographies read by me so far. For me the breakdown appears broadly like this:
Caroline&#8217;s Bankeyfields is an online community grafted on to a real community and concerns itself with real life issues therefore exhibits online essentially all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to focus on the types of <strong>virtual association</strong> I have observed with 10 of the 12 mini-ethnographies read by me so far. For me the breakdown appears broadly like this:<br />
Caroline&#8217;s <em>Bankeyfields</em> is an online <strong>community</strong> grafted on to a real community and concerns itself with real life issues therefore exhibits online essentially all the aspects of local communities. Its focus is local interest.<br />
Tracy&#8217;s <em>Forest of the Moon</em> and <em>Northlands</em> communities share all the major aspects of community with the addition of the creative-imaginative role-playing skills but mostly outside the non-online community world. Its focus is role play.<br />
Eneas&#8217; <em>Dublin</em> virtual community acts and reacts as a non-online community with the exception that real persona&#8217;s are mostly concealed. It is a masked community. Its focus is events and pleasure.<br />
John&#8217;s <em>The Session</em>, community is predominantly online yet replicates the non-online community world due to the kinship, affection and well-tempered advice of its members towards one another. Its focus is all aspects of Irish Music.<br />
Sarah&#8217;s <em>quilting</em> group underpins its identity as a community by sharing family details and pictures with one another. Its primary focus is all aspects of quilting.<br />
Andy&#8217;s <em>Steelmen</em> is an online community grafted onto a non-online community. The entry qualification is a passionate interest in gossip about a football club which is its sole focus.<br />
Now I come to Henry&#8217;s term &#8216;<strong>online specialist focus group</strong>&#8216; which I like very much.<br />
Henry&#8217;s <em>Ning</em> groups appear to have a shared interest but the warmth of community interaction remains largely absent.The focus is practical teaching and events.<br />
Sibylle&#8217;s <em>Sleeping Cats</em> group lack the warmth and concern about which John wrote so they remain a narrow online specialist cat sleep focus group.<br />
Maz&#8217; <em>mscdystopia</em> is also a relatively narrow online specialist focus group but there is nothing in its rules or behaviour to prevent it developing into a community.<br />
Arthur&#8217;s <em>flickr and Yeats</em> group is extremely narrowly defined as a double narrow filtered specialist online group which lets its focus on Yeats and the visual speak for itself and sees no need of other interaction.<br />
I wrote this for others to comment upon and amend as well but it has helped me clarify in my own mind the spectrum between an alliance for a particular purpose and a true online community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalculture-ed.net/arthurh/2009/11/08/week-seven-summary-cont-some-lessons-learned-from-our-ethnographies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
