
This week has been taken up with working on the virtual ethnography. It has kept me away from the lifestream, to a certain extent.
Reading Hine (2000), along with Jen’s feedback, has helped me understand a little more clearly why I am writing these weekly reflections. I was not sure why I had to write the reflections, apart from it being something that I had been asked to do, so it was a fairly instrumental task for me. (I understand reflection and the value of it, but I was not quite clear why I was being asked to reflect on why I had chosen certain feeds to go into the lifestream as I had already written about them in the notes.) However, Hine’s point about reflection, albeit in an ethnographic context, has helped me come to a deeper understanding of the process that I am engaged in. She states that ‘an ethnographer of the Internet cannot hope to understand the practices of all users, but through their own practices can develop an understanding of what it is to be a user.’ (2000, p 54). It is the reflection on one’s own actions that is the key for me here. By writing this reflection I am developing an understanding of what it is to be a user in a digital environment, but I had to read this before I could join the dots and realise that that is what I have been doing, but maybe not quite achieving in the content of the reflections.
Hine goes on to challenge the notion that an ethnographer should, in order to maintain observer status, avoid becoming too familiar with the work of their own informants (2000, p 54). However, becoming increasingly familiar with digital environments can result in the development of the proficiency to encounter and produce digital artefacts (Hine, 2000, p 55). This has been my experience. As I encounter more digital artefacts, listen to and read the voices that make up the Internet, I feel I am moving into the Internet’s ‘communities of practice’. As I endeavour to incorporate these voices into my own product, this lifestream, I feel I am being further pulled into the digital world.
Having said this, I do not yet feel as if I am a member of a community. Gillen (2009) cites Hammam’s (1997) three-fold definition of a community: a group of peoplewho share ties and an area (space) for certain periods of time. I may be feeling as if I am being drawn into a community or communities, but I am not a member as, at the moment, this drawing in is taking place in a solitary fashion. It’s a strange feeling.

Over the last couple of weeks, I have found myself challenged by the ethnographic exercise. I keep asking myself – “is this really research?” I found some reassurance in the Hine article, particularly with regards to understanding the community from the perspective of a participant. Your blog post reassures me someone else is thinking along the same tracks.
Hello Andy,
Thank you for your comment. I am struggling with the virtual ethnography that we have been asked to do and that is because, in my case, I can’t add any of the participants’ voices to the accounts and so I feel that the ‘research’ and ‘the researcher’ – me – are a bit of a sham. I’m a bit concerned with lurking, as well. I am considering calling it ‘Virtual Ethnography by a Lurker’!
I hope you are getting on well with yours.
All the best,
Sarah