- Week 1 summary: look at me, I’m collecting stuff
- Week 2 summary: how invasive is surveillance?
- Week 3 Summary: 140 keystrokes? Please!
- Week 4 summary: Curators or Tomb Raiders?
- Week 5 (non) summary: On the road again
- Week 6 summary: first thoughts on digital ethnography
- Week 7 summary: pondering Haraway
- Week 8 summary: posthuman kleshas
- Week 9 summary: (re)cognising the cognisphere
- Week 10 summary: embracing the uncanny
- Week 11 summary: Authority
- Week 12: lifestream summary
After speaking with Jen I decided to do my final assessment on authority, in particular how we sometimes feel that authority is compromised in digital spaces and what if anything we (should?) do to assert our authority. I first noticed this theme in Hine’s account of digital ethnography:
Along with travel comes the notion of translation (Turner, 1980). It is not sufficient merely to travel, but necessary also
to come back, and to bring back an account. That account gains much of its authoritative effect with the contrast that it constructs between author and reader: the ethnographer has been where the reader cannot or did not go.
and is a feature in the later readings on critical perspectives and even – now I reflect back – in the very first dystopian weeks.
I won’t give away all my ideas in this post – just give you a visual introduction:






![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dee28453-f652-44de-b340-db9e62877cc0)

No comments